Skip to main content

Texas Heartbeat Act

The article that I am choosing to post this week’s blog about is several articles based around the new Heartbeat Act that passed in Texas earlier this week. While there is alot of controversy revolving around this Act, the one thing I’m choosing to focus on is that Texas has created an anonymous tip-line website to report individuals who are believed to have performed or had an abortion. From a personal stand-point, I cannot believe that anyone would create a website to target women for making a personal choices about their body and personal lives. Upon seeing the first tweet about the website (which can be found linked below as well as quoted on my Twitter page) I immediately did a quick Google search to see if this was true because it’s such a bizarre concept to me that other people can be so obsessed with what a woman they aren’t even affected by chooses to do with her body. Through some further research I found that while the website was active for a small amount of time, the domain holder “GoDaddy”s CEO pulled the website yesterday. He stated that the website directly violated GoDaddy’s terms and conditions and gave the creator 24 hours to take down the site on their own accord. It got removed after the 24 hours was up yet people are still posting old links to it spreading the misinformation that the website can still be used for anonymous tips. I have a new found respect for GoDaddy’s CEO and think he made the right decision to pull the website. 


Tweet- https://twitter.com/meidastouch/status/1433297454875561994?s=21

Article- https://www.theverge.com/2021/9/3/22656196/godaddy-texas-right-for-life-abortion-whistleblowing-site

Comments

  1. Wow I can not believe that the kind of website existed even if it was taken down. This is a perfect example of how media can be used to spread false information. With how easily accessible the internet is and so many people on social media, I highly doubt that this is an uncommon action and it has been done before. The GoDaddy's CEO did do a good job at pulling down the website like you said, but should it even been able to be posted to begin with? I think that this instance sheds a light onto how lenient a terms and conditions page can be. I am not sure how the GoDaddy website works, but I would think that you would have to share what you want your website to be about. If that information is having to be shared, then this website should never have been able to be created. Overall, good on the GoDaddy's CEO for taking it down because some people would not have done that. I really enjoyed this post good job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This event is a perfect example of how fake news and a false authority in media can have real world consequences. Vigilantly websites like this that seek to bring "justice" to what they feel is wrong, bypasses the legal system and puts women in danger. And what about women who miscarry? Will they now be targets of sites like this? Very scary times that we live in.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Sheep and The Shepard

 For this post the media I’m choosing to observe is a Tik Tok I saw earlier this week. I saw the Tik Tok and automatically thought about this blog and the purpose of the blog. The tok tik (posted on my twitter and listed at the end of the post) was a post targeted towards being anti-vaxx for the COVID-19 vaccine. The person posting the video was targeting the “liberal sheep” partying and showing off an article he found that said that the CEO of the Pfizer vaccine had not even taken it himself. I was curious about this and did about 3 minutes of research. Upon the quick research I learned that yes, the CEO of Pfizer did not have his vaccine for two reasons. A. He wanted to wait until the vaccine was available for his age group and didn’t want to “cut in line” and take a vaccine from someone who was very high risk potentially needed the vaccine. B. He also had not had his vaccine because the original article was posted March 5th even though the Tik Tok video was posted mid august. I ...

Vaccine Mandate

 For this weeks blog post I decided to use a Washington Post article (found on my Twitter or at bottom of page) I found. I found a headline about the situation while I was scrolling through my Twitter feed for this class and decided it looked like a good topic to explore. The original headline for the tweet was titled “New York forcing citizens to receive covid vaccine”. I googled “vaccine mandate New York” and found the Washington post article that went more in depth about the situation. Just doing a quick scan through I was able to get some more details about the situation. The mandate has actually been in effect for very long however, a judge recently declined a halt to the mandate. The mandate also does not effect everyone. It only effects municipal employees and only requires one dose of any vaccine. The judge argued that this was no different than requiring a measles vaccine which they gave for years. This is the perfect example of a headline trying to grab readers attention ...

Ted Cruz and Dr. Faci Fire off

 For this post I went with something that I saw on twitter. I saw a tweet about how Ted Cruz had made a comment saying Dr. Faci should be prosecuted because he is spreading faulty science and finding. After a quick google search I was able to find a TON of article breaking down the details of what provoked this comment. There is a clear bias argument from both parties because Ted Cruz is strictly republican and has always had a more strict way of looking at this. Dr. Faci is clearly more liberal with his ideas and is the chief medical advisor for Biden. A lot of people sided with Ted Cruz on this specific instance agreeing with him. However, Dr. Faci laughed it off and recalled a certain date. Ted Cruz had accused Dr. Faci of stuff like this before and they launched an investigation upon whether his findings were fraudulent. Everyone checked out yet Ted Cruz still continues to not let it go.